We've all heard people say that Qwen is near-Opus level, but I have receipts and am here to be transparent with you.
Opus 5 is a great model. It's not great enough.
Qwen
Qwen is a family of large language models developed by Alibaba Cloud. Many Qwen models are distributed under the free and open-source Apache 2.0 license, the source-available Qwen License, or the non-commercial Qwen Research License; other proprietary Qwen models are served through Alibaba Cloud.
Qwen on Twitter / X
Qwen3-TTS is officially live. We’ve open-sourced the full family—VoiceDesign, CustomVoice, and Base—bringing high quality to the open community.- 5 models (0.6B & 1.8B)- Free-form voice design & cloning- Support for 10 languages- SOTA 12Hz tokenizer for high compression-… pic.twitter.com/BSWpaYoZWj— Qwen (@Alibaba_Qwen) January 22, 2026
Introducing Claude Opus 5
Opus 5 is a step change improvement for the Opus tier powering long-running agents while delivering improvements in coding and professional work.
Claude Opus 5 Is Highly Capable, But Is No Mythos
Claude Opus 5 is a weirder than usual release to evaluate, for two reasons.
Something is afoot in the land of Qwen
I’m behind on writing about Qwen 3.5, a truly remarkable family of open weight models released by Alibaba’s Qwen team over the past few weeks. I’m hoping that the 3.5 …
Opus 4.7 isn't dumb, it's just lazy — Shimin Zhang
Some follow up experiments with Claude Opus 4.7 based on Simon Willison's Pelican Benchmark Shocker.
Qwen Studio
Qwen Studio offers comprehensive functionality spanning chatbot, image and video understanding, image generation, document processing, web search integration, tool utilization, and artifacts.
Qwen Studio
Qwen Studio offers comprehensive functionality spanning chatbot, image and video understanding, image generation, document processing, web search integration, tool utilization, and artifacts.
Opus Aims to Disrupt the Music Streaming Industry through Ethereum and IPFS
Read the story Opus Aims to Disrupt the Music Streaming Industry through Ethereum and IPFS posted in our category on CCN.com here.
I ran this in progressive mode w/Opus4.6 on a paper where refine.ink had given me very useful feedback. It caught many of the same minor issues! Main difference was in high level feedback-with refine it was much closer to what I'd expect from experts. But not bad for a fraction of refine cost! (~$3)
chenhaotan.bsky.social
Peer review is facing a death spiral, and AI production tools are speeding it up. AI-assisted reviewing is necessary and should be open. We built OpenAIReview: open AI reviewing for everyone, for the cost of a coffee. openaireview.github.io/blog.html 🧵
Looks not too impressive in this graphics. This is ~ on par with Opus 4.7, apparently. Opus 4.7 was >20x the cost. Full comparison: artificialanalysis.ai/models/comparisons/mimo-v2-5-… (Stated facts *not* independently verified by me! I'm not even sure I am reading that page right)
mr. TIM
Korean lab, Motif, releases a 341B model that performs on par with DSv4 (1.6T) they have some actual architectural innovations and a detailed tech report huggingface.co/Motif-Technologies/Motif-3-Be…
