Macron’s mission: Le Pen-proof France before the 2027 election

The far-right National Rally is already calling foul over controversial personnel moves.

Address to the French People.

President Emmanuel Macron addressed the French people this Wednesday, March 5, at 8 p.m. from the Élysée Palace.

Far Right Groups Targeting Pride Month - Google My Maps

Tracking the far right anti-LGBTIQ activists, Christian Nationalists, White Supremacists, and violent extremist groups targeting LGBTIQ events during Pride Month. Incident Report: https://tinyurl.com/PrideIncident Map Information: https://tinyurl.com/MappingPride #DefendPride Resources: https://itsgoingdown.org/defendpride/ Project of Radical Reports: https://www.radicalreports.org Contact: radicalreportsnewsletter@gmail.com

The new right: Anatomy of a global political revolution – European Council on Foreign Relations

The thinkers and ideas of the rising nationalist right merit the political mainstream's attention. Only by understanding them can it build a resilient counter-p

Interview: Motivation of mobilization | Urban Media Archive

Motivation of mobilization | UMA - visual, audiovisual and audio resources that show the city and tell about the urban life of Central and Eastern Europe of the XIX-XXI centuries

Indextreme.fr

Indextrême : Observer, répertorier et connaître les symboles graphiques du fascisme en France.

Newsletter

Breaking news, analysis, art, and culture from a progressive Jewish perspective. Sign up for our newsletter!

How Y’all, Youse and You Guys Talk (Published 2024)

What does the way you speak say about where you’re from? Answer all the questions below to see your personal dialect map.

The French nuclear deterrent in a changing strategic environment | Note de la FRS | Foundation for Strategic Research | FRS

The Foundation for Strategic Research (FRS) is France's main centre of expertise on international security and defence issues.

Interview: Forms of participation in the protest | Urban Media Archive

Forms of participation in the protest | UMA - visual, audiovisual and audio resources that show the city and tell about the urban life of Central and Eastern Europe of the XIX-XXI centuries

Individuals, institutions, and innovation in the debates of the French Revolution

Significance How do democracies make decisions? We can read transcripts from parliament houses and legislative halls to see how particular ideas are introduced and debated, but we understand very little about the general principles of how these systems deal with information, or the origins of those principles. Here we study the parliamentary assembly of the first 2 years of the French Revolution, a model for democracies and revolutions across the globe, and show how patterns of speaking are created, picked up, and ignored or propagated. Political ideology, top–down rules, and individual charisma all affect how word patterns survive and thrive or, conversely, disappear and drop away. , The French Revolution brought principles of “liberty, equality, fraternity” to bear on the day-to-day challenges of governing what was then the largest country in Europe. Its experiments provided a model for future revolutions and democracies across the globe, but this first modern revolution had no model to follow. Using reconstructed transcripts of debates held in the Revolution’s first parliament, we present a quantitative analysis of how this body managed innovation. We use information theory to track the creation, transmission, and destruction of word-use patterns across over 40,000 speeches and a thousand speakers. The parliament as a whole was biased toward the adoption of new patterns, but speakers’ individual qualities could break these overall trends. Speakers on the left innovated at higher rates, while speakers on the right acted to preserve prior patterns. Key players such as Robespierre (on the left) and Abbé Maury (on the right) played information-processing roles emblematic of their politics. Newly created organizational functions—such as the Assembly president and committee chairs—had significant effects on debate outcomes, and a distinct transition appears midway through the parliament when committees, external to the debate process, gained new powers to “propose and dispose.” Taken together, these quantitative results align with existing qualitative interpretations, but also reveal crucial information-processing dynamics that have hitherto been overlooked. Great orators had the public’s attention, but deputies (mostly on the political left) who mastered the committee system gained new powers to shape revolutionary legislation.

Left & Right: The Psychological Significance of a Political Distinction

This book brings together for the first time an updated, revised collection of influential essays and articles that capture some of the most exciting scientific and scholarly contributions to the topic ...

Epstein Family Values • EQUATOR

The billionaire patriarchs of the American far-right want to rule an economy of masters and servants

LinkED - Cartographie de l'extrême droite française

LinkED - Cartographie interactive de l'extrême droite française

Foreign Man in a Foreign Land — The Rise of Homonationalism

Gay Coonservatives are Black & Queer folk who throw their respective communities into the fire to feel some warmth. In this video, We explore the concept of strategic disavowal, Black American exceptionalism, Transmedicalism & more.