This was based on the second screenshot in the post I linked to, but I think it might be a misunderstanding on my end (I thought the checkbox is grayed out and unselectable, leading me to misinterpret the message underneath, which I’ve now realized is the same as Bsky’s; maybe it’s not unselectable)
Sep 4, 2026 at 1:08 PM
Verified Account Tracker (@verified.evil.gay)
⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️ !!! >>> NOT AFFILIATED WITH BLUESKY <<< !!! ⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️ A bot tracking newly verified accounts on Bluesky. Check out the lists tab for full lists on verified accounts. ran by: @mmatt.net https://github.com/mmattbtw/bsky-verified-account-tracker
Enneagram Labeler for Bluesky
You'll be sent to Bluesky's own login page to approve. We only ask to verify your identity — your password is never shared with this site.
Verified Adult Creator Labeler (@verified.babesky.com)
Subscribe to see adult industry creator labels, verified with AV by @Babesky.com 💖 Platform specific labels are opt-in (remove like to remove label): https://bsky.app/profile/verified.babesky.com/post/3mbtvkjjeak2v 🔗 Browse Directory: club.babesky.com
bsky.md — Bluesky as Markdown
Fetch any public Bluesky content as clean, portable Markdown. No auth, no API key.
bsky.md — Bluesky as Markdown
Fetch any public Bluesky content as clean, portable Markdown. No auth, no API key.
Where Are The Exits?? · thoughts
What the AT protocol needs from Bluesky PBC now, and why it's not to focus on bsky.app
The frustrating thing about this is that when you "Login with Bluesky", you're not even actually logging in with Bluesky The App. You may be using a Bluesky PBC-hosted PDS, but it has nothing to do with @bsky.app, other than it's the PDS you're assigned when you create an account on their client.
When @bsky.app pulls this kind of crap often, whilst also expecting the community to do the heavy-lifting in actually convincing people to try out the AT Protocol... it's really difficult to feel hopeful about the future of Bluesky and its constituents. I imagine many agree with this stance.
Rude1 Haunted Badness. ⁂
Bluesky’s statement deriding Threads users as “guinea pigs” is not representative of Blacksky Algorithms, the atproto ecosystem or the open social web more broadly. Communities form around communication networks. And communities should never be trolled for whatever tool helps them find each other.
Hi, I hear you on this. There's a longstanding issue with Bluesky's more granular permission sets I'm hoping to get resolved, which is blocking Sill from implementing a better set of permissions. github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/issues…
Bluesky permission sets require inconsistent aud parameter · Issue #4850 · bluesky-social/atproto
github.comAnyone know why Bluesky is so poorly integrated into @ifttt.bsky.social? A bookmark trigger seems pretty obvious. Something for @mu.social?
✅ @jcsalterego.bsky.social has been verified by @bsky.app.
