How Social Media Brings Out the Worst in Us

A new book argues that social media does more harm than good and we might be happier and healthier using it less.

Why Protecting Kids from Social Media May Make Things Worse — Douglas Rushkoff

I’m supposed to give a talk next week about kids and social media and the need for more media literacy education, more regulation of platforms, and more substantive discussion about how to keep our kids from media-induced self-harm. The whole event is well-meaning, but is characterized by a sense of worry and protection. And for some reason, after years of making those sorts of arguments in my articles and documentaries, I have a strong impulse to pivot the other way.

The Harms of Social Media Restrictions and Bans for Minors

How Age-Based Social Media Bans and Restrictions can Negatively impact Youth. The Benefits of Social Media for Youth - Education, Activism & Creating Community

Ten Myths About the Effect of Social Media Use on Well-Being

This viewpoint reviews the empirical evidence regarding the association between social media use and well-being, including life satisfaction and affective well-being, and the association between social media use and ill-being, including loneliness, anxiety, and depressive symptomology. To frame this discussion, this viewpoint will present 10 widely believed myths about social media, each drawn from popular discourse on the topic. In rebuttal, this viewpoint will offer a warranted claim supported by the research. The goal is to bring popular beliefs into dialogue with state-of-the-art quantitative social scientific evidence. It is the intention of this viewpoint to provide a more accurate and nuanced claim to challenge each myth. This viewpoint will bring attention to the importance of using rigorous scientific evidence to inform public debates about social media use and well-being, especially among adolescents and young adults.

Social media and youth mental health: Simple narratives produce biased interpretations.

Teen Life on Social Media in 2022: Connection, Creativity and Drama

Majorities of teens credit social media with strengthening their friendships and providing support while also noting the emotionally charged side of these platforms.

Social media’s enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction

In this study, we used large-scale representative panel data to disentangle the between-person and within-person relations linking adolescent social media use and well-being. We found that social media use is not, in and of itself, a strong predictor of life satisfaction across the adolescent population. Instead, social media effects are nuanced, small at best, reciprocal over time, gender specific, and contingent on analytic methods.

The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent

The question whether social media use benefits or undermines adolescents’ well-being is an important societal concern. Previous empirical studies have mostly established across-the-board effects among (sub)populations of adolescents. As a result, it is still an open question whether the effects are unique for each individual adolescent. We sampled adolescents’ experiences six times per day for one week to quantify differences in their susceptibility to the effects of social media on their momentary affective well-being. Rigorous analyses of 2,155 real-time assessments showed that the association between social media use and affective well-being differs strongly across adolescents: While 44% did not feel better or worse after passive social media use, 46% felt better, and 10% felt worse. Our results imply that person-specific effects can no longer be ignored in research, as well as in prevention and intervention programs.

Banning under-16s won’t fix social media

The toxic ecosystem we have today can be better addressed with competition than regulation

Social Media Use and Well-Being Across Adolescent Development

Importance Social media’s association with adolescent well-being remains debated. Heavy use has been associated with distress, while abstinence may cause missed connections. Objective To investigate 3-year longitudinal associations between after-school social media use and adolescent well-being using a large longitudinal cohort dataset modeled within a repeated cross-sectional framework. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included Australian students in grades 4 through 12 (2019-2022). After-school social media use was self-reported and grouped as none, moderate, or highest. Well-being was assessed using 8 validated indicators (eg, happiness, life satisfaction, emotional regulation), dichotomized as high vs low. Well-being was assessed concurrently with social media use during the annual school-based survey in each year of data collection. Data analysis was conducted from June to July 2025. Exposures Self-reported after-school social media use between 3 pm and 6 pm (weekdays), classified into 3 categories: none (0 h/wk), moderate (>0 to <12.5 h/wk), and highest (≥12.5 h/wk). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was overall well-being, measured as the mean score across 8 validated domains (happiness, optimism, life satisfaction, worry, sadness, perseverance, emotional regulation, and cognitive engagement), dichotomized as high vs low (<3 on a scale of 1-5). Secondary outcomes were each individual well-being indicator, similarly dichotomized. Mixed-effects logistic models were used for analyses, stratified by sex and adjusted for demographic covariates. Results The analytic sample included 100 991 adolescents, contributing 173 533 observations (86 582 [49.9%] observations from female participants; mean [SD] age, 13.5 [2.2] years). A U-shaped association was observed between after-school social media use and well-being. Compared with moderate users, adolescents with the highest use had greater odds of low well-being (grades 7-9, girls: odds ratio [OR], 3.13 [95% CI, 2.88-3.39]; boys: OR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.86-2.72]), while nonusers also had higher odds of low well-being in later adolescence (grades 10-12, girls: OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.41-2.27]; boys: OR, 3.00 [95% CI, 2.01-4.46]). These patterns were consistent across survey years and robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of students in grades 4 through 12, social media’s association with adolescent well-being was complex and nonlinear, varying by age and sex. While heavy use was associated with poorer well-being and abstinence sometimes coincided with less favorable outcomes, these findings are observational and should be interpreted cautiously.

The Kids Are (Mostly) Alright: New Pew Study Deflates The Social Media Panic

A couple weeks back, Jonathan Haidt published another entry in his ongoing campaign to convince the world that social media is inherently ruining kids’ lives. This one was a victory lap title…

Debate: Social media in children and young people – time for a ban? Weighing up the implications and limitations of age-based social media restrictions

Recent legislation in Australia banning social media accounts for children under 16, alongside similar proposals worldwide, has ignited debate about whether age-based restrictions are an effective way to protect young people's mental health. While the intent of such bans is to reduce exposure to harmful content, their feasibility and effectiveness remain unclear. Enforcement requires robust age verification, often relying on sensitive data such as government-issued identification or facial scans, which raises privacy concerns and can be circumvented through the use of VPNs. Moreover, social media use is diverse. Although it can intensify harms such as bullying, it also provides vital opportunities for connection and support, particularly for marginalised adolescents. Removing access to accounts may limit risks within platforms, but does not prevent exposure to harmful content elsewhere, nor does it guarantee increased offline engagement. Importantly, blanket bans fail to address unsafe design features embedded within social media or to equip adolescents with the skills needed to navigate online environments. More targeted, evidence-based regulation that promotes safer platform design and accountability may provide a more effective pathway to protecting young people's well-being.

The great rewiring: is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness?

The evidence is equivocal on whether screen time is to blame for rising levels of teen depression and anxiety — and rising hysteria could distract us from tackling the real causes.

The great rewiring: is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness?

The evidence is equivocal on whether screen time is to blame for rising levels of teen depression and anxiety — and rising hysteria could distract us from tackling the real causes.