







Here is some standard.site docs stats. There may be imperfections in this data but it's interesting nonetheless ~3,820 weekly active authors ~2,200 daily active authors (58% of WAA post any given weekday) 73% day-over-day retention among daily posters Net author growth of ~+200/day
Standard.site - One schema. Every platform.
standard.siteMay 20, 2026 at 10:30 PM

Elena Rossini 🌈 (@_elena@mastodon.social)
Attached: 1 image 📝 #WSocial state of the network - Friday July 10th 📣 for those who are curious about it, considering the enthusiastic endorsement by prestigious European institutions #OpenData allows me to crunch numbers. On day 23 since its beta launch in Brussels, W Social has 11291 accounts: - 469 new users since yesterday - 899 users have published one or more posts - 72 new users posting since yesterday - 92% have never* published a single post *may be related to #WIdentity and its 13-step process
Bluesky feed engagement — image-count analysis
The left chart tiers authors by actual follower count (at analysis time). The right chart tiers authors by median likes per post — a proxy for effective reach. Interesting divergence: under the follower definition, medium-size accounts show no 4-img penalty; under median-engagement, the pattern is different.
The strain on scientific publishing
Scientists are increasingly overwhelmed by the volume of articles being published. Total articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science have grown exponentially in recent years; in 2022 the article total was approximately ~47% higher than in 2016, which has outpaced the limited growth - if any - in the number of practising scientists. Thus, publication workload per scientist (writing, reviewing, editing) has increased dramatically. We define this problem as the strain on scientific publishing. To analyse this strain, we present five data-driven metrics showing publisher growth, processing times, and citation behaviours. We draw these data from web scrapes, requests for data from publishers, and material that is freely available through publisher websites. Our findings are based on millions of papers produced by leading academic publishers. We find specific groups have disproportionately grown in their articles published per year, contributing to this strain. Some publishers enabled this growth by adopting a strategy of hosting special issues, which publish articles with reduced turnaround times. Given pressures on researchers to publish or perish to be competitive for funding applications, this strain was likely amplified by these offers to publish more articles. We also observed widespread year-over-year inflation of journal impact factors coinciding with this strain, which risks confusing quality signals. Such exponential growth cannot be sustained. The metrics we define here should enable this evolving conversation to reach actionable solutions to address the strain on scientific publishing.

Researchers | alphaXiv
Browse researcher profiles on alphaXiv: publications, citation metrics, research areas, and the papers behind them.

Elena Rossini 🌈 (@_elena@mastodon.social)
📝 #WSocial state of the network 📣 for those who are curious about it, considering the enthusiastic endorsement by prestigious European institutions. #OpenData allows me to crunch numbers (information about Bluesky PDSs is readily available). On day 18 since its beta launch in Brussels, W Social has 7935 accounts: - 90,5% have never* published a single post - 82,2% have 0 followers - 78% follow 0 accounts (may be related to #WIdentity and its 13-step process) LMK if you find this useful
SkeetBeaver
Free analytics tools for Bluesky/atproto. Lookup user timelines, friends, and followers. Browse and compare user lists. View username changes.
thebigtradeoff
thebigtradeoff - the new blog in LiveJournal. There should be new interesting records soon.
How long does a web page live 🤔 >5yrs ago I asked the internet, and made some new friends: x.com/dietrich/status/1135778377766… After a multi-year research collab with @archive.org, ODU and Filecoin Fdn... (largest study like this ever done) ... we have results! tldr: It's bad. fil.org/blog/the-web-isn-t-forever-ne…
"what standard.site publications gained the most subs this week?"
most-subscribed publications this week · pub search
pub-search.waow.tech"what standard.site publications gained the most subs this week?"
most-subscribed publications this week · pub search
pub-search.waow.techI've been absolutely swamped lately, but thanks to the atproto community, @sequoia.pub hasn't slowed down! Here's a quick rundown: A <sequoia-subscribe> web component that lets readers create a site.standard.graph.subscription record for your publication. Huge thanks to @heaths.dev for this!
there's 180?!?! of them listed here, not including general tools or bsky clients (those are separate collections). some are beta, alpha, or pre-release i also have a bsky list of apps/orgs that have accounts in my profile too. and @proto feed shows their posts + relevant posts from devs+enthusiasts
atmosphere-apps (by Ariel M. (she/her)) — Semble
semble.so#atdev friends, if you had an analytics database of all atproto records, what are some interesting things you'd like to know? - how many total posts? - how many chars have been typed across all posts? - how many live/dead PDSes out there? - how many "Jerry, no!"s? - something with the social graph?
Created a @standard.site aggregator for biblical studies publications. So far, @joelwerner.me and I are the only active authors I've found using compatible platforms. More are welcome! longform.sermon.garden
Atmospheric Exegesis
longform.sermon.garden