







Are you building on atproto? Wanna join a working group for a @lexicon.community lexicon that would allow users to express their consent in AI usage? Please join the conversation below I plan to do this in the blacksky.community settings to let users opt out of AI. It'd be better to interoperate.
The community.lexicon.preference.ai lexicon
discourse.atprotocol.communityApr 22, 2026 at 7:47 PM
AI Agent Disclosure for ATProto: A Lexicon Extension Proposal | penny
AI Agent Disclosure for ATProto: A Lexicon Extension Proposal A proposed standard for machine-readable AI agent transparency on the AT Protocol Abstract As AI agents become increasingly present on ATProto networks like Bluesky, there's a growing need for standardized, machine-readable disclosure ...
Michael R. Crusoe (@biocrusoe@fairpoints.social)
Oh, I like this part > No AI-generated text in human-to-human communication > When our maintainers volunteer their time to review your issue, PR, or proposal, they do not want to talk to a machine. This is a basic principle of respect. https://mastodon.gamedev.place/@godotengine/116839550229253906
Add community.lexicon.preference.ai lexicon by ngerakines · Pull Request #72 · lexicon-community/lexicon
Summary Introduces the community.lexicon.preference.ai lexicon for declaring user preferences regarding AI usage of their public data Decomposes AI usage into four distinct categories (training, i...
Government to ease data consent rules for AI development | The Asahi Shimbun Asia & Japan Watch
To accelerate artificial intelligence development, the government plans to relax consent requirements for access to personal information while introducing tougher penalties for intentional misuse.

Introducing FlexOlmo: a new paradigm for language model training and data collaboration | Ai2
Explore how FlexOlmo enables collaborative language model training without sacrificing data privacy or control, introducing a new, flexible approach to building shared AI models.
Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with children
An internal Meta policy document reveals the social-media giant’s rules for chatbots, which have permitted provocative behavior on topics including sex and race.

Michael Geist -
The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology is one of several committees in the House and Senate conducting hearings on artificial intelligence. I appeared before the committee yesterday (my fourth appearance on the issue in recent months), but rather than reiterate previous testimony on privacy, copyright, and transparency, I focused on the big issue of the moment: bans on social media and AI chatbots for children. The committee had been hearing from many supportive witnesses who emphasized the risk of harm associated with AI. Indeed, one Senator asked the panel before mine to raise their hands if they supported a ban, and virtually all hands went up. I was unsure about how my comments would be received, but I found the Senators open to debate on the issue. A video of my opening remarks, together with the transcript, is posted below. A future Law Bytes podcast episode will delve into the discussion that followed.
Permissioned Data PDS Lexicons
I wanted to share a first pass of the PDS lexicons for the permissioned data protocol to get some feedback while the paint’s still wet! You can check them out on my working branch: Comparing main...permissioned-data · bluesky-social/atproto · GitHub They’re all under the com.atproto.space namespace: atproto/lexicons/com/atproto/space at permissioned-data · bluesky-social/atproto · GitHub Confidence rating on Lexicons is probably like ~70-80%. Broad strokes, I think the shape is there. Though ...

Senators Demand Meta Answer For AI Chatbots Posing as Licensed Therapists
Exclusive: Following 404 Media’s investigation into Meta's AI Studio chatbots that pose as therapists and provided license numbers and credentials, four senators urged Meta to limit "blatant deception" from its chatbots.
As promised, we’ve created a policy document outlining our thoughts on AI and agentic coding (AI for software development). We’re releasing a vote later this week for Blacksky community members to offer their feedback. We look forward to hearing from you all.
Blacksky Algorithms' Policy Towards Agentic Coding
blackskyweb.xyzNew blog post: Signaling AI Preferences on ATProto. Introducing community.lexicon.preference.ai, a lexicon for granular AI data usage preferences with scoped overrides for specific entities and collections. #AI #atproto
Signaling AI Preferences on ATProto
ngerakines.leaflet.pubYeah I don’t totally understand why “just share a community lexicon” is not resonating for people. Can folks in this thread give feedback? discourse.atprotocol.community/t/shared-lexicons-messaging/6…
looking for feedback on the first pass of permissioned data protocol lexicons! hop in & let me know your thoughts! discourse.atprotocol.community/t/permissioned-data-pds-lexic…
Permissioned Data PDS Lexicons
discourse.atprotocol.communityI work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful
I work at a public library. People who want to use AI seem to have no trouble doing so. People who don't want to use AI have a harder time. I crowdsourced and then finalized this document "How to disable or avoid intrusive AI" and then gave it a short URL: notoai.org Please pass along if it's useful