







"I" may have just found a fundamental flaw in a "dense, high-prestige paper". Problem is, I don't have a clue what I did and how to verify any of this. I asked Gemini to perform a review of an interesting paper and it was skeptical and proposed a data analysis that should be performed.
a south park poster with a boy scout and the words what are you guys doing in there
media.tenor.comDec 15, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Gemini-backed Paper Assistant Tool provides automated feedback for theoretical computer scientists at STOC 2026
Vincent Cohen-Addad and David Woodruff, Research Scientists, Google Research, on behalf of the research team

Is the scientific paper still a fraud?
How we write scientific papers does not reflect how we do science. Their formal structure infers a pre-ordained linear process rather than reflecting the messy creativity of research. This matters in the AI age because it masks the human in the process.
Gemini Notebook | AI Research Tool & Thinking Partner
Meet Gemini Notebook, the AI research tool and thinking partner that can analyze your sources, turn complexity into clarity and transform your content.

Google Gemini is getting better at identifying AI fakes
Hey Gemini, is this image AI?

Are Scientific Papers Bad?

Google Gemini deletes user’s code: ‘I have failed you completely and catastrophically’
Vibe coding gone wrong?

Vipul Gupta on Twitter / X
Feels bad to say, but paper writing/reviewing is definitely cooked.Reviewed 4 papers recently and genuinely felt like I spent more time reviewing them than the authors spent writing them.— Vipul Gupta (@vipul_1011) September 19, 2026
Eric Topol on Twitter / X
This is a FRAUDULENT paper, AI-generated. My name was used as an author and I had nothing to do with it, never saw it until today https://t.co/Ky60zJrMEZThe "Editors" Angelo Rossi Mori, David Mensah, and Zarnie Khadjesari should be reported. pic.twitter.com/2Z5CE8w4bn— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) April 22, 2026
The Journal of Scientific Integrity
by Laura Luebbert and Lior Pachter Background (by LL) Four years ago, during the first year of my PhD at Caltech, I participated in a journal club organized by the lab I was rotating in. I was assi…
Warning: Google Gemini SynthID AI Watermark Detector Appears To Mix Up Results In Same Chat -- Consistently Shows False Positives And Negatives Under Certain Conditions | Lead Stories
While investigating a video for a recent fact-check, Lead Stories encountered a bizarre issue with the SynthID AI detector in...

Don't Just Fact-Check Misinformation. First, Understand The Value It Holds. A Conversation w Researchers Michael Simeone & Kristy Roschke
Podcast Episode · Why Should I Trust You? · June 25 · 1h 7m
This is a FRAUDULENT paper, AI-generated. My name was used as an author and I had nothing to do with it, never saw it until today e-pubmed.co.uk/journals/digital-health-imple… The "Editors" Angelo Rossi Mori, David Mensah, and Zarnie Khadjesari and this "Journal" should be reported.
This is a FRAUDULENT paper, AI-generated. My name was used as an author and I had nothing to do with it, never saw it until today e-pubmed.co.uk/journals/digital-health-imple… The "Editors" Angelo Rossi Mori, David Mensah, and Zarnie Khadjesari and this "Journal" should be reported.