







monopodial -> sympodial growth apps -> ecosystems "Monopodials put all their energy into growing tall quickly, whereas the sympodial plants hedge with multiple different leading edges, which is more resilient. The next high-status career will be sympodial." substack.com/@davidlang/note/c-209012857?u…
David Lang (@davidlang)
substack.comMay 22, 2026 at 3:13 PM
Ecosystem Plugins - Wesley's notes
Bridging the interop gap and addressing the long-tail of user needs
A varied ecosystem and terminology. - Nel Ramblings
Habitat's road to release: 05 adopting opensocial - building [at] habitat
This week, Habitat as a platform for organizational data is finally beginning to take shape. We've been working with other great atproto devs in the Communit…
atpotato
creating fun apps, helpful tools, and approachable content for the atproto and bsky ecosystem

Maximum power in evolution, ecology and economics
Ludwig Boltzmann suggested that natural selection was fundamentally a struggle among organisms for available energy. Alfred Lotka argued that organisms that capture and use more energy than their competition will have a selective advantage in the evolutionary process, i.e. the Darwinian notion of evolution was based on a fundamental, generalized energy principle. He extended this general principle from the energetics of a single organism or species to the energetics of entire energy pathways through ecosystems. Howard Odum and Richard Pinkerton, building on Lotka, extended this concept to ‘The maximum power principle’ and applied it to many biological and physical systems including human economies. We examine this history and how these ideas relate to concepts from other disciplines including philosophy. But there has been considerable confusion in understanding and applying these concepts which we attempt to resolve while providing various examples from routine life and discussing some unresolved issues. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Thermodynamics 2.0: Bridging the natural and social sciences (Part 2)’.

curious to hear other #atproto devs’ thoughts on fragmentation in the ecosystem? is there a thing as too much choice? many users, but all across various apps implementing their own lexicons?
"we're building rainforests, not skyscrapers" diverse ecosystems with lots of different life forms and symbiotic relationships and growth! @schlage.town got me feeling hopeful, talking about building an Atmospheric (sub) stack
Some thoughts on a taxonomy of ATmospheric apps. I see an ecosystem developing with three categories: - Symbionts, tightly coupled with Bsky; - Offshoots, growing large, parallel communities; and - Cuckoos, which scan as skeuomorphic clones on ATproto but go beyond. numergent.com/2026-04/A-taxonomy-of-ATmosph…
A taxonomy of ATmosphere applications
numergent.com
Sort keys: ordering a list nobody owns | Offprint
Atmosphere MCP · aturi.to

Labeler Relay

Building the Social Graph with Hubble and Jetstream - 50 Shades of Protocol
AT Moderation Architecture | bryan newbold

Bluesky Protocol Services
It's working - Tynan's Leaflets
Call for Participation: AT Protocol Ecosystem Action Research - Ecosystem Action
Roomy joins Modal incubator - Roomy
Better, Together - Graze Newsletter
Adversarial internecting - permablog

Huey Newton introduces Revolutionary Intercommunalism, Boston College, November 18 1970