if bluesky didnt exist, what atproto app would be called the "flagship" atproto product? ⚠️ 2 rules, you can't name your own project, and it can't be a fork of bluesky repos like social-app.

As far as i understand the #atproto ecosystem has 3 great problems: 1) the main huge relay is under control of #bluesky 2) The #PLC (identity register) is under control of the same company 3) also the protocol itself is developed and at the moment under control of bluesky.

soooooo where did we land on the whole "internet handle" vs "atproto handle" vs "bluesky handle" vs ...

Is there a reason why we only allow one handle to one DID? I get it as a product decision for bluesky itself, but I don't get it in the context of atproto as an ecosystem. what if I want to be `@taurean.bryant.land` here and `@taurean.work` on a professional service?

The goal shouldn't be to get journalists and politicians posting on Bluesky, the goal should be to get them to adopt atproto. That requires different tactics, different products, different incentives.

This is why I would like Bluesky to advertise ATProto to devs (I know Ivan, he is cool, but he should be advocating atproto in this thread) x.com/IvanVendrov/status/2092031150…

I think if a bluesky board member can't explain to his friends how to use atproto feeds and moderation labelers to curate their experience then it may need significantly more UX work