dokieli on the Authentic Web

WebID - W3C Wiki

The W3C is still exploring better ways to do authentication, for example in the 2014 workshop on authentication. The WebID is a Community Group, and anyone can start a Community Group. A Community Group does not necessarily reflect the endorsement of the W3C, but we encourage grassroots communities to experiment with technology that may become a future standard.

dokieli

Write, publish, and annotate articles from your web browser. Your content stays yours.

Contextual Inquiry: Inspire Design by Observing and Interviewing Users in Their Context

Through observation and collaborative interpretation, contextual inquiry uncovers hidden insights about customer’s work that may not be available through other research methods.

Supporting People and Ideas | Bodhi Ventures

We are committed to discovering new approaches to coordination and inspiring creativity, unlocking the full potential of web3. We focus on decentralised crypto networks and the web3 stack built around it.

Interviewing Users (2nd Edition) | Free EBook with Purchase | Steve Portigal

Expert researcher Steve Portigal updates his classic Interviewing Users to provide fresh guidance on interviewing techniques.

Four "Digital Identity" lessons every Web3 builder should know - blog.boscolo.co

This article was originally published on Mirror.xyz May 17, 2022

About DOAJ – DOAJ

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. Learn more about DOAJ’s privacy policy.

Wiki Comunitária do AT Protocol

Página Inicial da Wiki Comunitária do AT Protocol

Welcome to the Open WebTech Association

None

A Self-Authenticating Social Protocol - Bluesky

Bluesky’s mission is to drive the evolution from platforms to protocols. The conceptual framework we've adopted for meeting this objective is the "self-authenticating protocol."

CFP: Religion, Politics, and Cognitive Warfare: Information, Interpretation, Conspiracy, and the Struggle for Reality

The Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory (JCRT) invites proposals for an online conference entitled Religion, Politics, and Cognitive Warfare: Information, Interpretation, Conspiracy, and the Struggle for Reality. The proceedings will be considered for publication in a special issue of the JCRT. This conference investigates how beliefs, paranoia, and conspiratorial modes of knowing shape a contemporary cognitive battlespace in which actors struggle to define truth, authority, and reality itself. Drawing on Michel Foucault's Lectures on the Will to Know and Julia Kristeva's This Incredible Need to Believe (2024), we focus on practices of selective fact use and "truth-selecting" that construct alternative epistemic orders while claiming privileged access to what is "really" going on. Rather than treating conspiracy thinking as merely political or psychological, the conference foregrounds its religious dimensions: faith in hidden powers, moral dualism, apocalyptic expectation, and hermeneutical struggle over revelatory access to the real. Conspiracy cultures routinely reproduce theological structures of knowing—visions of salvation and corruption, truth and deception, initiation and blindness. At the same time, new forms of "cognitive warfare" reframe these religious energies within state and platform attempts to govern perception, attention, and trust. Artificial intelligence, algorithmic media, and strategic information campaigns do not only deliver messages; they create digital ecologies in which suspicion becomes faith-like and revelation is continual. The conference organizers are seeking proposals of high academic quality that take a reflective and analytical approach to both general and specific topics with international appeal or focus. We encourage contributions from scholars of religious studies, philosophy, communication, sociology, security studies, psychology, media, and related fields. Submissions should engage religion as a dynamic force—conceptually, historically, or materially—within the cognitive battlespaces of our time. We encourage contributions from a spectrum of perspectives, approaches, and methodologies. We are not interested in papers that simply rehearse or promote particular conspiracies, or that use the conference as a platform for calling out disliked groups. We are not interested in polemics, jeremiad, or de facto advocacy pieces. Instead, we welcome theoretically informed and methodologically rigorous work that takes the religious and epistemic dimensions of cognitive conflict seriously as objects of critical inquiry.

FediForum | Growing the Open Social Web un-workshop, 2026/03/02

GitHub - ThisIsMissEm/questionable-fyi: Questionable is an AT Protocol app for asking questions and getting answers, receiving asks and doing interviews or AMAs

Questionable is an AT Protocol app for asking questions and getting answers, receiving asks and doing interviews or AMAs - ThisIsMissEm/questionable-fyi

Chris Granger - "Is Web3... anything?"

The term “web3” seems pretty fluid and is being used as a label for a bunch of disparate ideas. Given that it’s a decentralized group describing a decentralized movement, that lack of focus isn’t exactly surprising. Almost by definition it’s going to end up being different things to different people.

DIDComm: The Future of Secure and Decentralized Communication

How the W3C-Defined DIDComm Protocol is Revolutionizing Digital Messaging