The content linked to this DOI is not currently available online
Sci-Hub : {title} [{doi}]
Elsevier vs Meta: first science publisher sues over scraped research papers
Science publishing giant Elsevier has joined a class-action lawsuit against Meta that alleges the reproduction of copyrighted works in developing the Llama AI model.
Elsevier vs Meta: first science publisher sues over scraped research papers
Science publishing giant Elsevier has joined a class-action lawsuit against Meta that alleges the reproduction of copyrighted works in developing the Llama AI model.
COS goes FOSS The sorry state of scientific publishing and how we could move to an open and resilient infrastructure
“The data files remains our property and are not deposited for free access.”
Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers
via CDC We’ve been tracking retractions of papers about COVID-19 as part of our database. Here’s a running list, which will be updated as needed. (For some context on these figures, see…
RegisterDOI | Simplified DOI Registration for Publishers & Researchers
Get genuine Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for your research articles, journals, and publications through our trusted registration service.
Elena Rossini 🌈 (@_elena@mastodon.social)
Update from my source dev 2: "Miraculously - only hours after publishing your article Elena - the issue seems to be resolved" I will update my article now.
Rate limit reached
You've reached the limit for the number of requests that can be made in a short period of time. Please wait a moment and try again. If you believe this message was shown in error or need assistance, please contact us at Aitratelimit@archive.org
Stackable Citation Knowledge — Live Demo: Annotate While Reading (CiTeX 2026)
This screencast is the pre-recorded demo segment from the talk "Stackable Citation Knowledge: Building on Nanopublications for Climate and Biodiversity Research", delivered remotely at the CiTeX 2026 Workshop on Citation Extraction and Parsing (DIPF Leibniz Institute, Frankfurt, 28-29 May 2026) by Anne Fouilloux (LifeWatch ERIC) and Jean Iaquinta (Vitenhub AS). The demo walks through the third production path for citation- typed nanopublications: an expert reader annotates a citation found in someone else's paper, rather than the citing author declaring intent (Author path) or an LLM-extraction pipeline inferring it retroactively (Extract path). The annotation is published as a signed CiTO Citation nanopub on the open Science Live network — ORCID-attributed, immutable via Trusty URI, and contestable by counter-nanopubs. Worked example: while reading Wernberg et al. 2016 (Science, 353:169-172, "Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem"), the reader infers that Wernberg cites reference 11 - Poloczanska et al. 2013 (Nature Climate Change, 3:919-925, "Global imprint of climate change on marine life") - as the global authority for climate-driven marine species redistribution. The annotation is published to Science Live with relation cito:citesAsAuthority and a one-sentence rationale tying it to the authors' planned Mediterranean Iberian extension. This is the alternative to LLM-based citation intent extraction: same downstream signed nanopub, human expert reader instead of a language model in the loop. Complements OpenCitations, WikiCite, and CiTO-extraction tools (GROBID, CEC, GRAPHIA, OFFZIB) by providing a citable target for any typed-citation output. Tools used: - Science Live Zotero plugin (Zotero 7+, plugin v1.0.6) - Science Live platform (platform.sciencelive4all.org) - Citation with CiTO template (built on CiTO and FaBiO ontologies) Related materials: - Talk repository (Slidev source, demo script, references): https://github.com/ScienceLiveHub/citex2026-stackable-citations - Live deck: https://sciencelive4all.org/citex2026-stackable-citations/ - CiTeX 2026 workshop: https://sites.google.com/view/workshop-on-citation-extractio/
Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata
This paper describes the scholarly metadata collected and made available by Crossref, as well as its importance in the scholarly research ecosystem. Containing over 106 million records and expanding at an average rate of 11% a year, Crossref’s metadata has become one of the major sources of scholarly data for publishers, authors, librarians, funders, and researchers. The metadata set consists of 13 content types, including not only traditional types, such as journals and conference papers, but also data sets, reports, preprints, peer reviews, and grants. The metadata is not limited to basic publication metadata, but can also include abstracts and links to full text, funding and license information, citation links, and the information about corrections, updates, retractions, etc. This scale and breadth make Crossref a valuable source for research in scientometrics, including measuring the growth and impact of science and understanding new trends in scholarly communications. The metadata is available through a number of APIs, including REST API and OAI-PMH. In this paper, we describe the kind of metadata that Crossref provides and how it is collected and curated. We also look at Crossref’s role in the research ecosystem and trends in metadata curation over the years, including the evolution of its citation data provision. We summarize the research used in Crossref’s metadata and describe plans that will improve metadata quality and retrieval in the future.
Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the limitations of the current scientific publication system, in which serious post-publication concerns are often addressed too slowly to be effective. In this Perspective, we offer suggestions to improve academia’s willingness and ability to correct errors in an appropriate time frame.
Helpful reminder from Elsevier that they have the "legal power" to do what they want with your journals. You have the collective power to take your editorial work elsewhere.
Stephanie Wang
🚨Elsevier forces out Games and Economic Behavior (GEB) Editor, entire editorial board has resigned, current board only handling new submissions until Nov. 14 #econsky
I was just thinking this as I was scrolling arXiv recently, how cool it would be to have those papers published as at://records and to be able to see all the links between them.
Ronen Tamari
"The properties that make AT Protocol compelling for social networking are the same properties the research community has been asking for" Exciting vision for the future of science publishing on ATProto @row1.ca @opensci.dev @nokome.bsky.social #ATScience
Wish there was a better academic publishing system? Bluesky and its underlying ATProto technology, along with services like @chive.pub and the broader @atproto.science ecosystem, could do the job. #AcademicSky 🧪 leaflet.pub/2f431faf-c125-4d34-ac52-e41a2…
Each academic paper should have its own Bluesky account
leaflet.pub
Chive
We're ramping up our alpha, and we'd love for you to join at chive.pub! Since we launched back in January, we've been adding a ton of fun features; and to introduce them, we're going to be doing a series of deep dives over the next couple weeks on chive.leaflet.pub.
The New York Times is now blocking The Wayback Machine from accessing its articles. That means you'll no longer be able to view archived versions of NYT stories published in 2026 and beyond on archive.org. (All those posts you see tracking changes to NYT headlines and ledes? They relied on WBM).
v1.122 is rolling out today, featuring a better way to discover and share articles, blog posts and newsletters across the Atmosphere via new, dynamic Standard.site link cards. 🧵
