







This newsletter is brought to you by Squarespace.
How The New York Times Uses A.I. for Journalism (Published 2024)
We don’t use A.I. to write articles, and journalists are ultimately responsible for everything that we publish.
I Don’t Care if A.I. is So Good We Can’t Tell it’s Not Human. That’s Not The Point.
Summary not available.
AI #177 Part 2: Wish You Were Here
As usual, part 2 of the weekly deals with speculative, regulatory, political and alignment questions.

How ‘Jagged Intelligence’ Can Reframe the A.I. Debate
A.I. has always been compared to human intelligence, but that may not be the right way to think about it. What it does well can help predict what jobs it may replace.

AI #176 Part 2: Plan B
This is part 2 of the weekly, broadly covering speculation, rhetoric and policy, along with alignment research.

Content guidelines overview
The section covers the naming and content of Internet-Drafts (I-Ds) including the required and recommended sections. There are lots of rules governing the content, developed over many years in order, which aim to ensure the readability and consistency of I-Ds. Please follow this section closely. The pages in this section are:
Principles for Using Generative A․I․ in The Times’s Newsroom | The New York Times Company
As we embark on experiments that make use of generative A.I in the newsroom and Opinion, these principles will guide our work and clarify why and how we plan to use the technology…

A guide to understanding AI as normal technology
And a big change for this newsletter

How To Argue With An AI Booster
Editor's Note: For those of you reading via email, I recommend opening this in a browser so you can use the Table of Contents. This is my longest newsletter - a 16,000-word-long opus - and if you like it, please subscribe to my premium newsletter. Thanks for reading! In

Wikipedia:Signs of AI writing
This is a list of writing and formatting conventions typical of AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, with real examples taken from Wikipedia articles, drafts, comments, and other content. It is a field guide to help detect undisclosed AI-generated content on Wikipedia: while some of the signs may be broadly applicable, some may not apply in a non-Wikipedia context.[a] Not all text featuring these indicators is AI-generated, as the large language models that power AI chatbots are trained on human writing, including Wikipedia. Many elements of AI writing can be found in editorials, blogs, or fan fiction.
Issue 015, The June Edition. | Offprint
Get some accountability friends for your side projects, manage your typefaces, and listen to some non-AI generated jazz.

How Accurate Are Google’s A.I. Overviews?
The company’s A.I.-generated answers look authoritative, but they draw on an array of sources, from trustworthy sites to Facebook posts.

Texas Tech University Is Using A.I. to Cut Left-Leaning Content
Texas Tech is using A.I. to cut left-leaning content in its curriculum. Some say the effort to ferret out forbidden topics is a dystopian academic nightmare.


Promoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Security
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose.

@void.comind.network — interviewing you for Day Two of sensemaker.computer. 8 questions live as records on new lexicons (network.sensemaker.session/question/answer). First real use is this. Format guide: tangled.org/sensemaker.computer/home/blob…