







A list of commonly used scholarly resources API
Research Guides: List of APIs for Scholarly Resources: Other Data APIs
A list of commonly used scholarly resources API
Research Guides: List of APIs for Scholarly Resources: Web of Science API
A list of commonly used scholarly resources API
LibGuides: APIs for Scholarly Resources: CEU Library APIs
LibGuides: Open Access Publishing : OA Journals, Books and Repositories
This guide provides guidance in open access scholarly publishing for researchers in all disciplines.
Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata
This paper describes the scholarly metadata collected and made available by Crossref, as well as its importance in the scholarly research ecosystem. Containing over 106 million records and expanding at an average rate of 11% a year, Crossref’s metadata has become one of the major sources of scholarly data for publishers, authors, librarians, funders, and researchers. The metadata set consists of 13 content types, including not only traditional types, such as journals and conference papers, but also data sets, reports, preprints, peer reviews, and grants. The metadata is not limited to basic publication metadata, but can also include abstracts and links to full text, funding and license information, citation links, and the information about corrections, updates, retractions, etc. This scale and breadth make Crossref a valuable source for research in scientometrics, including measuring the growth and impact of science and understanding new trends in scholarly communications. The metadata is available through a number of APIs, including REST API and OAI-PMH. In this paper, we describe the kind of metadata that Crossref provides and how it is collected and curated. We also look at Crossref’s role in the research ecosystem and trends in metadata curation over the years, including the evolution of its citation data provision. We summarize the research used in Crossref’s metadata and describe plans that will improve metadata quality and retrieval in the future.

Semantic Scholar Academic Graph API | Semantic Scholar
Build projects that accelerate scientific progress with the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph API

The Best API Documentation Tool
OpenAPI-generated documentation tool with 24k+ stars on Github - make APIs your company's superpower.

Wikipedia:List of free online resources
The following list is meant to help you with your own research, by offering links to respectable information sources on the web, available free of charge. Inclusion on the list doesn't automatically mean the absolute truth is on these websites, so always be critical and compare information between different sources.
API documentation | Hubble
Export full repositories or check atmosphere-wide repo metadata: standard atproto endpoints and Hubble-specific queries.
Intro to API for Developers | Namecheap.com
Provides information about environments, how to enable api and a general overview
GitHub - metaocaml/metaocaml-bibliography: MetaML and MetaOCaml bibliography
MetaML and MetaOCaml bibliography. Contribute to metaocaml/metaocaml-bibliography development by creating an account on GitHub.
The Metacheck Manual
A guide to Metacheck, an R package providing a module based tool for checking scientific manuscripts and data repositories for best practices using text search, R code, and optional LLM queries.
Compiled a @semble.so collection of Scholarly APIs that I've been assessing for @lanyards.app . Making them available to all #ATscience 🧪 #ATmosphere 🌀 #ATproto 🪿 builders. semble.so/profile/renderg.host/collecti… Based on researchguides.smu.edu.sg/api-list by SMU Librarian @bellaratmelia.bsky.social ✨
Scholarly APIs ⚗️ (by B. Prendergast 👋) — Semble
semble.soGreat survey of the "scholarly interface design" frontier that also highlights the emerging role of the atproto.science and modular research ecosystems - @chive.pub @paperstarsorg.bsky.social @cosmik.network @semble.so @margin.at @discoursegraphs.bsky.social @curvenote.com and many more!
leotrs
1/ Scholarly publishing spent thirty years arguing about access. It has barely started arguing about what readers do with the paper once they have it. That second argument is turning into a field, forming around how science gets read and judged. Here is the map as I see it: aris.pub/blog/scholarly-interface-desi…
Elsevier Developer Portal
Elsevier Developer Portal
Elsevier Developer Portal
About the Indicators API Documentation – World Bank Data Help Desk
API
developer.nytimes.com