[Edit 3/2014: I no longer endorse all the statements in this document. I think many of the conclusions are still correct, but especially section 1 is weaker than it should be, and many reactionarie…
Reactionary Philosophy In An Enormous, Planet-Sized Nutshell
I have heard the following from a bunch of people, one of whom was me six months ago: “I keep on reading all these posts by really smart people who identify as Reactionaries, and I don’…
A Historical Reference of React Criticism—zachleat.com
There have been a number of criticisms levied at the React project over the years, some of them handled and some of them still wavering in the wind. In this…
Reactionary Centrism: a Response to Jonathan Chait
Jonathan Chait recently criticized a 2018 essay I wrote about “reactionary centrism," a term that's picked up some steam over the years from journalists like Michael Hobbes and history professor Thomas Zimmer. Below, I've quoted some relevant passages from Chait's essay and some brief responses. Huertas defined
We Need to Talk About Reactionary Centrists
Sympathizing with the right while punching left is not the neutral position pundits seem to think it is
We Need to Talk About Reactionary Centrists
Sympathizing with the right while punching left is not the neutral position pundits seem to think it is
Editor's Notes: Reactionaries Are Not Fun Weirdos
One wonders why Richard Hanania has gotten so much attention.
ATF public comments analysis 2026-08
There Is No Antimemetics Division
Humanity is under assault by malevolent "antimemes"—ide…
There Is No Antimemetics Division
Humanity is under assault by malevolent "antimemes"—ide…
EFF Statement on Meta's Announcement of Revisions to Its Content
Update: After this blog post was published (addressing Meta's blog post here), we learned Meta also revised its public "Hateful Conduct" policy in ways EFF finds concerning. We address these changes
New Treatment Guideline, Same Old Denialism
The science is clear. CBT and GET are not useful treatments for ME/CFS. But cognitive dissonance is a powerful force, and we can fully expect continued denials from the conspiratorial fringe
Folks in mentions call me a “fascism apologist” for not calling Scott a crypto-reactionary. He IS credulous about reactionary ideas & “insight”, part of their recruitment pipeline, and his community overlaps heavily with theirs. A fellow traveller. Bad & dangerous enoug
Folks in mentions call me a “fascism apologist” for not calling Scott a crypto-reactionary. He IS credulous about reactionary ideas & “insight”, part of their recruitment pipeline, and his community overlaps heavily with theirs. A fellow traveller.Bad & dangerous enough.19/— Jonathan Korman 🟣 (@miniver) February 18, 2021
C.S. Lewis's dangerous idea : a philosophical defense of Lewis's argument from reason
132 p. ; 21 cm; Includes bibliographical references (p. [129]-130) and index; Taking C.S. Lewis seriously: apologetics and the personal heresy -- Assessing apologetic arguments -- C.S. Lewis, Elizabeth Anscombe, and the argument from reason -- Several formulations of the argument from reason -- Explanatory dualism -- The inadequacy objection
Andreas De Block on Twitter / X
It took Nature three years to publish this rebuttal, which clearly demonstrates the fundamental flaws in the original paper. In the meantime, the paper's conclusions influenced scientific debate and policy decisions. Such delays in correcting flawed research do real damage. https://t.co/QI3Ei3PE70— Andreas De Block (@DeblockBlock) August 13, 2026
Repeated False Accusations of Fascism — THE MALONE INSTITUTE
Are the policies of the left so flawed that they must resort to ad hominem attacks?
