Ray Fisman sent me an email with the above title and a link to the following story.
Noah Smith's Review of Power and Progress is Very, Very Bad
It should have been disowned, not republished
Casey Muratori – The Big OOPs: Anatomy of a Thirty-five-year Mistake – BSC 2025
Settling in, and looking ahead - pckt - Dev Journal
Hey Bloggers ! A lot has happened since our last post. Which always seems to be the case... We've been hard at work crafting new features and refining existing...
Ferhat Tura on Twitter / X
I have recently detected minor mistakes in the codes of a paper published in a high-quality journal and contacted the lead author first!, who acknowledged the mistake and contacted the journal. I thanked the author for doing open science and now we are collaborating on a paper💪— Ferhat Tura (@FerhatTura19) May 15, 2024
Contra Benn Jordan, data center (and all) sub-audible infrasound issues are fake
One of the most popular videos made about data centers ever is a complete moment-by-moment disaster
A Technical Deep Dive Into the New Raycast - Raycast Blog
The story behind Raycast's cross-platform rewrite and the details that make it feel fast, delightful, and familiar.
“Paging Dr. Fraud”: The Fake Publishers That Are Ruining Science
For years, spurious journals have proliferated online, promising academic credibility in exchange for cash.
Delaney Gillilan on Why Modern Web Needs Less
Don't Use Deep Research (Until You Watch This) | Gemini, OpenAI, and Perplexity Deep Research
Vitalik: An Ethereum Story // Full Film
steve hsu on Twitter / X
I think I’ve published the first research article in theoretical physics in which the main idea came from an AI - GPT5 in this case. The physics research paper itself (on QFT and state-dependent quantum mechanics) has been published in Physics Letters B.I've written an… pic.twitter.com/6IYDTS2JAt— steve hsu (@hsu_steve) December 3, 2025
thanks Maria! A little bird tells me the epilogue in my piece describes exactly what happened (someone at bsky allegedly read my article and increased their rate limit). I have a name, I need to see if they're willing to go on the record. So even the fix allegedly didn't come from W engineers LOOOL
Curious about the competing interests statesments for @i4replication.bsky.social’s @pnas.org paper. 1) funding for i4r comes heavily from an AI/tech tied group and 2) that many authors and none has a conflict of interest with LLMs and science? pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2524747123
PNAS
www.pnas.org
