Supermemory

Pieces | Infinite Artificial Memory for your Digital Workers and Agents

Pieces is your AI companion that captures live context from browsers to IDEs and collaboration tools, manages snippets and supports multiple llms - all while processing data locally for maximum control.

Who Does Your Agent Work For? The AI Super App Problem

Explore who controls AI agents in your digital life. This essay examines super apps, enclosure, and why the delegation layer between intent and action matters most.

Memory in Agents: What, Why and How

LLM memory gives language models persistent context across sessions. Learn how it works, how it differs from RAG and context windows, and how to add LLM memory to your agents with Mem0.

Why AI Coding Agents Forget — And How ArcticMem Fixes It

Explore ArcticMem, Snowflake’s persistent semantic memory system for AI coding agents. See how dual-tier memory improves benchmark pass rates to 73%.

Agentic Context Management: Solving Agent Memory and Cost by Treating Them as Lifecycle and Architecture Problems

Production AI agents' failures are less often due to an inability to reason well and more often because they cannot manage what is in their reasoning context: conversation histories, large prompts, large tool definitions, and ballooning tool outputs. Agents drown in their own accumulating history while paying a token cost that grows every turn, producing missing recalls within and across conversations. The incumbent response treats this as a storage-and-retrieval problem. We argue that framing is too narrow. Actively managing what an agent holds in mind is a lifecycle, not merely a store: it spans deciding what to remember, extracting and structuring it, choosing the right store per data type, consolidating and forgetting while preserving provenance, deciding what is relevant now, anticipating what is needed next, and compacting context to a budget without losing what matters. In serious production this operates not over a single user but across an organizational scope hierarchy. We name this discipline Agentic Context Management (ACM) and decompose it into five primitives: architecting, ingesting, scoping, anticipating, and compacting & consolidation. We then make the economic case: naive context accumulation grows token cost quadratically in conversation length, crude summarization buys linear cost at the price of an accuracy cliff, and only validated compaction achieves linear cost with preserved fidelity. We describe a reference implementation, Maximem Synap, that realizes the five primitives as a multi-tenant service and reports 92% on LongMemEval and 93.2% on LoCoMo under the configuration detailed in Section 6. We close with dimensions existing benchmarks do not yet capture, latency, token efficiency, and context-rot resistance, and the frontier of decision-level and organization-level context the category points toward.

The Shape of Memory Benchmarks

Why the familiar memory benchmarks are outdated, how the agent-native work looks today and why design your own.

DREAM — Dynamic Retention Episodic Architecture for Memory

Modern AI systems lack persistent, user-specific episodic memory. Existing approaches rely on short-term context windows, shallow preference storage, or static conversation logs that do not scale and cannot preserve meaningful long-term continuity. This paper introduces DREAM (Dynamic Retention Episodic Architecture for Memory), a scalable, opt-in, episodic memory framework designed to work with current LLM and agent architectures. DREAM integrates episodic summarization, user-controlled opt-in memory, semantic retrieval via per-user vector indexes, an adaptive retention mechanism that expands TTL based on user engagement, and horizontal sharding of orchestrators and storage for large-scale deployments. The paper details the architecture, components, data flows, and implementation examples, and argues that DREAM provides a practical path toward AI systems capable of consistent, privacy-aligned long-term reasoning. This project has been extended with a conceptual analysis and simulation of a "DREAM-as-a-Support" (DaaS) hybrid layer. This extension demonstrates DREAM's architectural extensibility, reframing it from a standalone framework into a foundational platform component. The DaaS model provides core memory governance such as adaptive retention (ARM) and user-centric opt-in as an on-demand service to complementary cognitive systems, validating the original four-pillar design through a scalable, internal API. Reference Implementation A reference implementation of the DREAM architecture is available as an open-source Python framework:Official Reference Implementation This implementation is intended for experimentation and architectural validation and does not represent a production-ready system DREAM Architecture — Official GitHub Repository

Agent Plugins

A portable package format for reusable components that extend AI agents.

The Anatomy of an Agent Harness

Learn how agent harnesses transform AI models into autonomous work engines. Explore core components: filesystems, sandboxes, and memory.

Memory Models: Towards Agents That Learn

Agents that truly learn from experience will be powered by memory models: models that create and curate token-space memory across model generations, trained with memory-native RL.

Code execution with MCP: building more efficient AI agents

Learn how code execution with the Model Context Protocol enables agents to handle more tools while using fewer tokens, reducing context overhead by up to 98.7%.

Memora scales agent memory to boost long-horizon productivity

AI agents can't remember past conversations. They must constantly reload or retrieve context, which grows less efficient as tasks get longer and more complex. Memora solves this with a scalable memory system separating what’s stored from how it's retrieved.

Context Constitution

Today we are releasing the Context Constitution: a set of principles governing how AI agents manage context to learn from experience.