Musings of a Trust Architect: The Gordian Club

Centre for Cryptographic Trust Infrastructure (CCTI)

Martin Kleppmann · University of Cambridge; Martin Pompéry · SINE Foundation

Building Software for a Zero Trust World

How we are helping to build Zero Trust architectures that safeguard the most protected data in the world

Encrypted Spaces — Research preview

An architecture for collaborative applications where data is encrypted and operations are cryptographically verifiable.

Privy Blog | Privy and Stripe: Bringing crypto to everyone

We started Privy a little over three years ago to make it easy for any developer to build better products on crypto rails. Whether crypto is core to your app or simply a new layer of functionality, a good crypto product should just feel like a good product, period. By making crypto usable, we help make it useful for everyone.

Encryption + Trust & Safety reading list (updated 2026-05-20)

CCFS cryptographically curated file system

The Internet was originally designed to be a next-generation phone system that could withstand a Soviet attack. Today, we ask the Internet to perform tasks that no longer resemble phone calls in the face of threats that no longer resemble Soviet bombardment. However, we have come to rely on names that can be subverted at every level of the stack or simply be allowed to rot by their original creators. It is possible for us to build networks of content that serve the content distribution needs of today while withstanding the hostile environment that all modern systems face. This dissertation presents the Cryptographically Curated File System (CCFS), which offers five properties that we feel a modern content distribution system should provide. The first property is Strong Links, which maintains that only the owner of a link can change the content to which it points. The second property, Permissionless Distribution, allows anyone to become a curator without dependence on a naming or numbering authority. Third, Independent Validation arises from the fact that the object seeking affirmation need not choose the source of trust. Connectivity, the fourth property, allows any curator to delegate and curate the right to alter links. Each curator can delegate the control of a link and that designee can do the same, leaving a chain of trust from the original curator to the one who assigned the content. Lastly, with the property of Collective Confidence, trust does not need to come from a single source, but can instead be an aggregate affirmation. Since CCFS embodies all five of these properties, it can serve as the foundational technology for a more robust Web. CCFS can serve as the base of a web that performs the tasks of today’s Web, but also may outperform it. In the third chapter, we present a number of scenarios that demonstrate the capacity and potential of CCFS. The system can be used as a publication platform that has been re-optimized within the constraints of the modern Internet, but not the constraints of decades past. The curated links can still be organized into a hierarchical namespace (e.g., a Domain Naming System (DNS)) and de jure verifications (e.g., a Certificate Authority (CA) system), but also support social, professional, and reputational graphs. This data can be distributed, versioned, and archived more efficiently. Although communication systems were not designed for such a content-centric system, the combination of broadcasts and point-to-point communications are perfectly suited for scaling the distribution, while allowing communities to share the burdens of hosting and maintenance. CCFS even supports the privacy of friend-to-friend networks without sacrificing the ability to interoperate with the wider world. Finally, CCFS does all of this without damaging the ability to operate search engines or alert systems, providing a discovery mechanism, which is vital to a usable, useful web. To demonstrate the viability of this model, we built a research prototype. The results of these tests demonstrate that while the CCFS prototype is not ready to be used as a drop-in replacement for all file system use cases, the system is feasible. CCFS is fast enough to be usable and can be used to publish, version, archive, and search data. Even in this crude form, CCFS already demonstrates advantages over previous state-of-the-art systems. When the Internet was designed, there were relatively fewer computers that were far weaker than the computers we have now. They were largely connected to each other over reliable connections. When the Internet was first created, computing was expensive and propagation delay was negligible. Since then, the propagation delay has not improved on a Moore’s Law Curve. Now, latency has come to dominate all other costs of retrieving content; specifically, the propagation time has come to dominate the latency. In order to improve the latency, we are paying more for storage, processing, and bandwidth. The only way to improve propagation delay is to move the content closer to the destination. In order to have the content close to the demand, we store multiple copies and search multiple locations, thus trading off storage, bandwidth, and processing for lower propagation delay. The computing world should re-evaluate these trade-offs because the situation has changed. We need an Internet that is designed for the technologies used today, rather than the tools of the 20th century. CCFS, which regards the trade-off for lower propagation delay, will be better suited for 21st-century technologies. Although CCFS is not preferable in all situations, it can still offer tremendous value. Better robustness, performance, and democracy make CCFS a contribution to the field. Robustness comes from the cryptographic assurances provided by the five properties of CCFS. Performance comes from the locality of content. Democracy arises from the lack of a centralized authority that may grant the right of Free Speech only to those who espouse rhetoric compatible with their ideals. Combined, this model for a cryptographically secure, content-centric system provides a novel contribution to the state of communications technology and information security.

Decentralized Identity Verification using Zero-Knowledge Proofs: A Privacy-Preserving Authentication Framework

In the contemporary online interaction, digital iden- tity is central, but most systems follow a centralized provider like Google or Facebook. Although convenient, these models pose ma- jor risks to data breach, surveillance, and single point of failure. The proposed paper proposes a privacy-sensitive decentralized identity verification system that uses Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) to allow users to make it through claims (e.g., age, citizen- ship, or enrollment) without any personal data being provided, thereby solving the challenges outlined in the paper. Our architecture integrates verifiable credentials, zero-knowledge-SNARKs and an issuer trust registry that is maintained on blockchain smart contracts to guarantee trustless verification and eliminate dependence on centralized authorities. Its system gives its users full control over credentials, allows reuse across applications, and does not expose data.A proof-of-concept implementation has shown the approach to be feasible with Circom and SnarkJS to generate proof, Solidity smart contracts to verify them, and a user interface implemented in React. Results of the evaluations showed that determination of the verification latency is low, the overhead to generate proofs is moderate, and no privacy leakage occurs. It can be used in potential applications such as education, e-governance, healthcare, finance, and online voting.

CryptPad: end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite

CryptPad: end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite

CryptPad: end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite

CryptPad: end-to-end encrypted collaboration suite

Cryptomator - Free & Open-Source Cloud Storage Encryption

Cryptomator is an open-source encryption tool for secure cloud storage. Protect your privacy for free on Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and more.

Web of trust

In cryptography, a web of trust is a concept used in PGP, GnuPG, and other OpenPGP-compatible systems to establish the authenticity of the binding between a public key and its owner. Its decentralized trust model is an alternative to the centralized trust model of a public key infrastructure (PKI), which relies exclusively on a certificate authority. As with computer networks, there are many independent webs of trust, and any user can be a part of, and a link between, multiple webs.

2026: The Year of Decentralised Trust Networks - The Open Co-op

After years of foundational work on PLANET and related projects, the pieces are finally coming together to create decentralised trust networks

Keybase

Public key crypto for everyone, publicly auditable proofs of identity.

Tinfoil - Private AI

AI that keeps your data private at all times. Fast, powerful, and verifiable, thanks to secure hardware enclaves.

A Spectrum of Consent

Blockchain & Decentralized Identity Architect — Internet Cryptography Pioneer — Co-author TLS Security Standard — Collaborative Tools & Patterns

Trust: the inside story of the rise and fall of Ethereum | Aeon Essays

Blockchain enthusiasts crave a world without bankers, lawyers or fat-cat executives. There’s just one problem: trust