







New post: "Generalization Dynamics of LM Pre-training"Most people (including me) assume that LMs smoothly mature from pattern-matching to generalizing. This mental model is wrong. The true dynamics are stranger, and far more fascinating! We call it Mode-Hopping. pic.twitter.com/SoNiCIKI2R— Jiaxin Wen (@jiaxinwen22) May 18, 2026
Physics of LM: Part 4.2, Canon Layers at Scale where Synthetic Pretraining Resonates in Reality
Concept Attractors in LLMs and their Applications
Empirically, we see that for prompts pip_{i}, pjp_{j} in each concept 𝒞\mathcal{C}, there exists a layer ll where:
Understanding LSTM Networks -- colah's blog
Humans don’t start their thinking from scratch every second. As you read this essay, you understand each word based on your understanding of previous words. You don’t throw everything away and start thinking from scratch again. Your thoughts have persistence.
LLM Daydreaming
Proposal & discussion of how default mode networks for LLMs are an example of missing capabilities for search and novelty in contemporary AI systems.

Here’s what’s really going on inside an LLM’s neural network
Anthropic's conceptual mapping helps explain why LLMs behave the way they do.

Brandon Stewart on Twitter / X
1/ New @Nature! We study how powerful institutions shape the information environment for LLMs. Commercial LLM training is opaque, so we trace a path from state-coordinated media -> training data -> model responses. pic.twitter.com/5LdFvzbFaf— Brandon Stewart (@b_m_stewart) May 13, 2026

Language model harnesses are compositional generalizers
Harnesses can lead to compositional generalization: we observe a property in training RLMs, in which similarly structured tasks are viewed as isomorphic and all individual LM calls in the harness become in-distribution.

Emergent Coordinated Behaviors in Networked LLM Agents: Modeling the Strategic Dynamics of Info Ops
Why Are LLMs Smart?
A popular way to explain how current LLMs work is to say that “all” they do is predict the next most likely word in a sentence.

elie on Twitter / X
nice pre training work by nous claiming ~2.5x efficiency gains, building on previous research like MTP/SuperBPE. overall intuition is that at each step you want the model to process and predict more tokens https://t.co/K33QtJiF5C pic.twitter.com/hDlSbv1Tg9— elie (@eliebakouch) May 13, 2026


How LLMs Actually Work
A from-the-ground-up walkthrough of how modern LLMs work, from tokens to transformer blocks to the next-token loop
An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learning
Inspired by the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting, we investigate the learning dynamics of neural networks as they train on single classification tasks. Our goal is to understand whether a related phenomenon occurs when data does not undergo a clear distributional shift. We define a “forgetting event” to have occurred when an individual training example transitions […]
Activation Oracles: Training and Evaluating LLMs as General-Purpose Activation Explainers
Clément Dumas4, Kit Fraser-Taliente6, Subhash Kantamneni6, Julian Minder3, Euan Ong6, Arnab Sen Sharma5, Daniel Wen1
Training great LLMs entirely from ground up in the wilderness as a startup — Yi Tay
Chronicles of training strong LLMs from scratch in the wild

Ever thought we acquire generalizable knowledge by discarding details and compressing our experiences? In a new BBS paper, @sabinasloman.bsky.social and I argue otherwise, proposing a novel way of studying human learning inspired by double descent in ML. Disagree? Propose a commentary by May 15 :)