Elon Musk Unmasked in Alex Gibney Documentary: “Insane a Person This Chaotic Has So Much Power”
He is the richest man on earth. An explosive new film from the Oscar-winning director suggests he may also be the most dangerous.

【沖縄県知事選挙】SNS「X」の投稿の約9割は県外から 選挙戦への影響も | 沖縄のニュース|RBC 琉球放送 (1ページ)
9月13日に投開票される沖縄県知事選挙について、8月の1か月間にSNS「X」で発信された「沖縄県知事選」を含む投稿の9割近くが、県外からの発信とみられることが分かりました。RBCは、SNS分析ツール「ソーシャルイン… (1ページ)

X Kills Nitter And Xcancel, The Last Ways To Read Tweets Without Elon Watching
When Twitter launched, it was originally designed to be just like an open protocol. In the early days, the company eagerly supported third party development, building on that protocol. But, because…

I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shaw
Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg’s desperation to be cool as they suck up to Donald Trump is so cringe it makes my skin crawl

Elon Musk’s xAI used child porn to train Grok models, lawsuit says
xAI accused of training Grok on real and AI-generated child pornography.

Value misalignments in X’s feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement
Social media feed algorithms rank content that is purported to be preferred by users, but the engagement behaviors that drive these algorithms are (at best) indirect proxies for users’ explicitly self-stated values. Are the resulting feeds value aligned, and if not, why? We investigate this question by annotating the basic human values expressed in participants’ X (Twitter) feeds (N = 715 US users), analyzing the relationship between the posts’ value expressions and the posts’ amplification in the ranked “For You” Page feed, and then comparing the amplified values to users’ own values. We observe that the inventory of posts from followed accounts reflects users’ self-stated values—but that there is an overall negative correlation (misalignment) between users’ explicit values and the value expressions the algorithm is more likely to amplify. We turn to engagement behavior to understand this misalignment and observe that users’ engagement behaviors can be misaligned with their stated values—likely causing the algorithm to learn and reflect these misaligned values. We also detect partisan differences consistent with this theory: While the algorithm amplifies values negatively correlated with both Democrats’ and Republicans’ self-stated values, they are more misaligned for Democrats. And in fact replying, a heavily weighted form of engagement, is associated with values that are less aligned for both Democrats’ and Republicans’ self-stated values, and is even more misaligned for Democrats. Taken together, these findings offer a glimpse into the tensions between the values that people hold and those that provoke reactions, and how these value tensions can produce misaligned outcomes.

X's Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds
X is driving engagement by making users fight in the replies.

Twitter Is Dead, X Is Elon’s Personal Propaganda Platform, Where Grok Checks His Feed Before Answering
Last week, Elon Musk’s Grok AI started spewing extreme antisemitism, calling itself “MechaHitler” and pushing conspiracy theories about Jewish people. But that wasn’t the mo…

What it means that the AI research community can't quit twitter - rl-blogging
Some quickly jotted thoughts working through the implications
Graham Platner Was the Perfect Twitter Candidate
Social media transformed his campaign into a political mirage.

LinkedIn and X Are Flooded With AI Spam, Browsing Data Suggests
An AI detection company found that amount of AI content that users actually see in their day-to-day browsing is shockingly high.

Musk’s X poses “serious risk to Americans’ privacy,” advocates warn FTC
FTC urged to reject Elon Musk’s bid to end X monitoring amid AI concerns.

The world’s first trillionaire is a killer
Elon Musk’s empire of wealth is built on suffering.

xAI Asks Court to Strip Alleged Grok Deepfake Nudes Victims of Anonymity
Four people suing Elon Musk's AI firm under pseudonyms due to the risks of being identified may face a difficult choice: Reveal your real names, or drop the lawsuit.

X (ex-Twitter) : de nombreuses collectivités, institutions ou personnalités quittent le réseau social ce lundi - ICI
Alors que Donald Trump est officiellement investi président des États-Unis ce lundi, des dizaines d'institutions, collectivités ou personnalités publiques ont choisi de quitter X (anciennement Twitter), jugé toxique pour la démocratie depuis son rachat par Elon Musk, fervent soutien du républicain.
TwitterのAIに「右派推し」のバイアス その対策とは?(平和博) - エキスパート - Yahoo!ニュース
ツイッターのAIアルゴリズムが、右派の政治家やメディアを左派よりも強く「推す」ことが、社内調査でわかった。その対策とは――。ツイッターは21日、日本を含む7カ国を対象とした、社内チームによる研究結果を

Do our social media algorithms correctly reflect our values? Our new article published today in @pnas.org shows that the answer is often not, and that the content that gets promoted into their ranked feeds is often actively counter to our values.
About X limits help.x.com/en/rules-and-policies/x-limit… “50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts.” (The “2,400 updates per day” in the third screenshot is apparently the old limit)
小嶋裕一 Yuichi KOJIMA
>記事執筆時点で日本語版には掲載されていないが、英語版に新たに追加された記述が話題を呼んでいる。 具体的には「未認証アカウントが行える1日あたりの通常ポストが50件、リプライが200件に制限される」というものだ。以前は「1日あたり2400件の上限がある」と記載されていた部分があり、これが変更されている news.denfaminicogamer.jp/news/260517b
I mostly still call them Twitter but am open to calling them “X” in clearly pejorative contexts. See also everything related to Grok, DOGE (especially what they did to USAID and the consequences thereof), and Elon Musk. AI-related: semble.so/profile/aiueo.ooo/collections…