Collection
The same month that Science's Editor-in-Chief called AI in publishing "slower, worse, and more expensive", the White House committed $5B+ to a national AI-for-science mission and ARIA backed a directory of 123 problems for AI researchers to solve. Meanwhile, a PNNL team argues the entire "AI scientist" wave has been scaling individual reasoners when the actual bottleneck is team coordination. Institutions are not arguing about whether AI belongs in. Full edition: hallway.aris.pub/no/018/
Trump Administration Announces More Than $5 Billion for the Genesis Mission, a National Mission on AI for Science
WASHINGTON, DC -- Today, Assistant to the President and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Michael Kratsios unveiled more


(PDF) Peer Reviewers Should be Allowed to Upload Manuscripts to AI
PDF | Publishers bar peer reviewers-but not authors or editors-from feeding manuscripts to AI. Cited confidentiality concerns don't survive scrutiny.... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science
Most AI-for-science systems focus on scaling a single reasoning process by using better models, larger context windows, long-horizon agentic execution, or digital co-scientists working with one principal user. However, challenging scientific problems are rarely solved by one reasoner alone. They are solved by teams whose members carry different priors, experimental background, tacit knowledge, and domain-trained intuitions. The open problem is therefore not only how to scale models, but how to develop "networked intelligence", scaling the connections between humans and AI systems so that a result or hypothesis produced in one context reaches another person, agent, instrument or robot that can act on it. We introduce Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents. As human users and agents work, the system captures important observations and hypotheses, tracks how they relate to the team's evolving knowledge model, and routes them to the person or agent whose next decision they can inform. We evaluate Mycelium through a real-world scientific discovery use case: a biological multi-omics campaign where shared context turned a local analytical finding into a cross-expert mechanistic constraint and ultimately into an experimental design. Finally, we describe networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts. This framework establishes when a scaled standalone agent is sufficient, and when isolated data and specialized expertise make a networked approach essential.

Don’t let AI steal all the joy: what scientists won’t give up to chatbots
Nature asked readers of the Nature Briefing what they like about their job and don’t want to hand over.
