Open (and/or informal) scientific critique

We just published a meta-analysis, where one finding is that "number of sickdays" is a bounded, not seldom zero/one-inflated variable, which is unsuitable for meta-analysis based on mean/SD. Today, I came across a meta-analysis including sickday stats like mean=9 and SD=27. doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05648-2

In our course and book _Calling Bullshit_, we posit that If something seems too good, or too bad, to be true, it probably is. Now as a college professor I'm pretty confident that overreliance can AI can harm our thinking ability, but just ten minutes of use? Let's dig into this this study a bit.