Folks, time for a so-called Request For Comments: I wrote a proposal to split badge declaration and badge appearance lexicons to better meet the needs and workflows of badge lovers everywhere! Find the full post in the community forum or read below 👇 discourse.atprotocol.community/t/badge-definitions-and-award…
Badge definitions and awards
discourse.atprotocol.communityMay 15, 2026 at 12:32 AM
RFC - Request for comments
RFC - Request for comments
RFC - Request for comments
RFC - Request for comments
RFC - Request for comments
How to Read an RFC
Requests for Comments (RFCs) are how we specify many protocols on the Internet. These documents are alternatively treated as holy texts by developers who parse them for hidden meanings, then shunned as irrelevant because they can’t be understood. This often leads to frustration and – more significantly – interoperability and security issues. However, with some insight into how they’re constructed and published, it’s a bit easier to understand what you’re looking at.
atproto-comments
Renders an AT Protocol (Bluesky) thread as a comment section. Supports SSR, sign-in, replies, and live updates.
Updated Auth Scopes Proposal · bluesky-social atproto · Discussion #4013
This is a discussion thread for the July 2025 Auth Scopes proposal
Yap: a particular kind of slop
Writing code comments has always been hard, because communicating is hard. It's hard to not assume context. It's hard to use the right terminology consistently. It's hard to even put comments in the right spots to begin with. It generally takes me several iterations of rewording a comment to get something I'm happy with. I'll write something lousey that takes 5 times as long to read as it should, and then read it. Then I'll remove a couple sentences, tweak what remains and do it again.
I've heard feedback on the @markpub.at lexicon! Thanks to @bmann.ca @blaine.bsky.social @thisismissem.social and others who have given really useful comments. I've published a new version for comment that is still very simple, but has more room for flexibility. Let me know what you think! markpub.at
Markpub.at Markdown Lexicon
markpub.atThink it's looking a lot nicer :) Got comments going too, I used @leaflet.pub's lexicon seems to work well for general use case of threaded comments on the atmosphere, thanks friends! We might actually launch this thing yet! Now the hard part: AppViews!
Don't worry guys, Part 2 is here: Houston, we've got a book & review lexicon! I don't think it is in it's final shape just yet, but I believe it to be a strong proposal, and well justified if I may say so, myself 😌
Road to a book lexicon (Part 2)
nick-the-sick.pckt.blog
Nick The Sick
I've been thinking a lot about how to define a shared book lexicon for the Lexicon Community Working Group: discourse.atmosphere.community/t/in-which-a-book-lexicon-is-… But, instead wrote a treatise against ISBNs. I hope I can link to it whenever someone asks why their import didn't work on @bookhive.buzz 😝
Lexicon Community needs a proper logo. I'm leading the effort to commission one and looking for a co-lead. Please volunteer, suggest someone, or repost. discourse.atprotocol.community/t/lexicon-community-icon/853
Lexicon community icon
discourse.atprotocol.communityMy latest (soft) proposal thanks to some really productive conversations we've been having.
𝕮
Join the discussion to figure this out here discourse.atprotocol.community/t/mapping-web-pages-to-canoni…
New project! I recently needed feedback on a doc I was writing and didn't have a good place to post it. So I built requested.fyi. Post docs, get comments, all on the Atmosphere. disnetdev.com/blog/rfcs-on-the-atmosphere
RFCs on the Atmosphere
www.disnetdev.com
